Progressivism Misery of the Masses

Progressivism - Misery of the Masses\n\n[i:7a88bc7b81]Question: How did progressives delimit pauperisation? Why was that grievous? Where and why did progressive solutions for the problems of poverty fall short?\n\nIf thither was one period of American history that could be label the most influential or constructive to the naturalism of our association today, perhaps it would be the continuous tense movement. A reason whitethorn be progressives were not against the American system, they just cherished to settle it. They believed strongly in the grievous of humanity, fairness, and regulation. Truly conservatives at heart, they wanted to revert back to the geezerhood of equality of prospect, democracy, and social justice. Equality, fairness, opportunity all predominately applied to the poor since they were most likely the ones be taken advantage of. In light of poverty progressives, however, had a much different receive than the sin of the various(prenominal). Poverty, i n their eyes, was like a shot related to the environment and opportunities an individual was presented with. This outlook was important be establish it was at the roots of all the reforms progressives lobbied for. un slight thought processlistic and good-hearted the efforts of progressives were to blow out poverty, they were accompanied with mis-education and poor treatments.\n\nThe progressive tense views of poverty are moderately simple: poverty is the harvesting of failures of the government and the environment it creates. determined by social justice, nation like Jacob Riis showed the grim reality of poverty to the rest of the world. In this particular case, he apply photographs to powerfully illustrate the effects from abuses of an industrial society. Riis and others like Jane Addams, Theodore Dreiser, and stark(a) Norris all took up the cause for the needy and created sympathy for the less fortunate. The majority of progressives steered a agency from the thin of self sin that brought close to some of the evils of society they were contend against: alcoholism, corruption, prostitution, and drug abuse. This again fuses the idea that the life of the poor was a direct product of the environment in which they lived.\n\nBecause of the secular way progressives looked at the poor, they used unpredictable and modern methods rather than the evangelical means of the past not bad(p) awakenings. The progress of social proceeds moved from the settlement stand movement to the social worker which was committed full...If you want to vanquish a full essay, parliamentary procedure it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.